Why I Robot Is Wrong

In one of the great moments of Science Fiction writing, Isaac Asimov proposed the 3 rules of robotics, that would ensure that humans thrived in a robotic universe. Asimov wrote them shortly after the United States entered World War II. They are:

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

Asimov missed that a society could become stupid if nurtured by robots. I’m sorry, but look at this guy:

Johannes_Vilhelm_Jensen_1944

Johannes Vilhelm Jensen

Nobel Laureate 1944

The internet is full of useless information about Jensen, all of it repeating old material, and much of that in the form of press releases or promotional copy, and all of it searched out by web robots and spat back at humans in a kind of war to dominate information … except the information is all the same and it’s largely just plain wrong. The guy was a writer of rather low calibre, who is best known for a kind of early, stuttering version of this:

clan of the cave bear 05Darryl Hannah in Clan of the Cave Bear

If Jean M Auel had written any more sequels, his heroine would have invented interstellar travel, Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, and Robots..

Jensen wrote a kind of new age fantasy of the quality of a third rate Atlantis is Here! conspiracy rag, in which he proposed an alternative to Darwin’s theory of natural biological selection. His fantasy was based upon cultural selection, based upon intelligence, or, in other words, on traditional European vs. communist or nazi values. I know, I know, it was 1944 and it was a way for the Swedes to stick it to the Germans, who really were smitten by the biological idea at the time, but, sheesh. Jensen is important for the effect his books had on modernism, but the Nobel Prize? Really? The lack of any meaningful information on Jensen, or any narrative that binds his influence with the writing of the 1920s and 1930s, is why writing, and the Internet, should not be left to robots, ever. Reclaiming that territory for humans presents tremendous opportunity for writers, but we’re going to need some new robot laws.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s